Hormouz AIHormouz AIHormouzSign in

Claude Fable 5.2 and Kimi K3.1 Pro compared

Claude Fable 5.2, Kimi K3.1 Pro, compared side by side on price, context, and capabilities. All are available on Hormouz through one OpenAI-compatible API.

Moonshot AI
Kimi K3.1 Pro
At a glance
Context window1,000,0001,048,576
Input typetext, image, filetext, image, video
Output typetexttext
Typetext, imagetext, image, video
Pricing
Input$4.8/M$2/M
Output$24/M$10/M
Cached input$0.2/M$0.2/M
Cache write$10/M—
Web search (per 1K calls)$10/1K—
Persian text
Tokens per 100 Persian words368248
Persian vs English tokens (same text)×2.4×2.2
Input cost of 1,000 Persian words$0.018$0.005
Features
Thinking (reasoning)Always onCan be switched on/off
Max output tokens128K—
Tool useYesYes
Structured output (JSON)YesYes
Prompt cachingYesYes
Capabilities
CapabilitiesVision · Tools · Streaming · Long contextVision · Tools · Streaming · Long context

Claude Fable 5.2 and Kimi K3.1 Pro: side-by-side summary

Claude Fable 5.2, from Anthropic, has a 1,000,000-token context window and costs $4.8/M for input and $24/M for output on Hormouz (M = one million tokens).

Kimi K3.1 Pro, from Moonshot AI, has a 1,048,576-token context window and costs $2/M for input and $10/M for output on Hormouz (M = one million tokens).

Both are available through one OpenAI-compatible API and one Hormouz key, and you switch between them by changing the model id in your request.

Where they rank

The compared models' scores beside a few models of similar standing.

Data from Artificial Analysis; scores out of 100.

FAQ

Which has the longer context window, Claude Fable 5.2 or Kimi K3.1 Pro?
Kimi K3.1 Pro has the longest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, compared with 1,000,000 for Claude Fable 5.2.
Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.2 or Kimi K3.1 Pro?
Kimi K3.1 Pro has the lower input price. Claude Fable 5.2: $4.8/M input, $24/M output and Kimi K3.1 Pro: $2/M input, $10/M output (per million tokens, on Hormouz).
Which scores higher on intelligence, Claude Fable 5.2 or Kimi K3.1 Pro?
Claude Fable 5.2 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 64.6 for Claude Fable 5.2 and 46.5 for Kimi K3.1 Pro.
Do Claude Fable 5.2 and Kimi K3.1 Pro reason before answering?
Claude Fable 5.2 always reasons before answering; the reasoning effort setting controls how much. Kimi K3.1 Pro can have reasoning switched on or off.
Can I use all 2 of these models through one API?
Yes. All of them are available on Hormouz through a single OpenAI-compatible API and one API key. Switch between them by changing the model id.
View Claude Fable 5.2View Kimi K3.1 ProTry Claude Fable 5.2 in the PlaygroundTry Kimi K3.1 Pro in the Playground

Customize this comparison →

Updated 2026-11-11